PG&E objects to judge's proposals on fire risk

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. says a judge's proposal to prevent the utility's equipment from causing any wildfires in 2019 would interfere with state and federal regulators, create safety risks and cost too much money.

In a court filing yesterday, PG&E said a separate criminal case being handled by U.S. District Judge William Alsup isn’t the right forum to address the wildfire threat.

Alsup earlier this month proposed ordering PG&E to remove or trim all trees that could fall onto its power lines and to cut off power during certain wind conditions.

U.S. prosecutors want Alsup to work with a court-appointed monitor to determine ways the utility could prevent its equipment from starting fires.

The judge is overseeing a criminal verdict against PG&E stemming from a deadly explosion of a company gas pipelines in 2010. He is considering additional terms of probation against the utility in that case.

Previous
Previous

Some recalled IRS workers can stay off the job

Next
Next

Hulu ups price for live-TV service, cuts basic package price